[BUGA] "Handwriting" (was: Mobile phone/PDA recommendations?)

Daniel O'Connor doconnor at gsoft.com.au
Sat Dec 10 13:25:13 CST 2005


On Sat, 10 Dec 2005 12:55, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote:
> So what we're really discussing here is: is the difference between
> more modern handwriting recognition sufficient to make a difference.
> I assert "no": I don't have an issue with the quality of the
> recognition, and I can't imagine that the number of stylus waves per
> character can be reduced to a point where it's faster than toy
> keyboards.

I think that is probably personal preference. eg how recognisable your 
handwriting is, how accurate you can tap the tiny keyboard, etc..

> Here, BTW, is a good reason to run X on your PDA: that way you can use
> x2x to attach a real keyboard to it when you're near another machine.

So you would only ever enter data on your PDA when you have it near a Real 
Computer (tm)?

I think the design of PDAs has in mind that you do extensive data entry on the 
real PC, then sync it over to the PDA.

I don't usually do that but that is mainly because syncing doesn't work very 
well with FreeBSD.


In any case you can get applications that will remotely control a Pocket PC 
from a PDA.

-- 
Daniel O'Connor software and network engineer
for Genesis Software - http://www.gsoft.com.au
"The nice thing about standards is that there
are so many of them to choose from."
  -- Andrew Tanenbaum
GPG Fingerprint - 5596 B766 97C0 0E94 4347 295E E593 DC20 7B3F CE8C
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://www.auug.org.au/pipermail/buga/attachments/20051210/052edfbe/attachment.bin


More information about the BUGA mailing list